Turn Websites into Data

Web Scraping Legal Landscape: EU vs US in 2024

Web Scraping Legal Landscape: EU vs US in 2024

Legal uncertainty remains the top concern for enterprise scraping projects. The landscape differs sharply between EU and US jurisdictions.

United States: hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn (9th Circuit) affirmed scraping publicly accessible data does not violate CFAA — unauthorized access requires bypassing authentication. Contract terms (ToS) may still create civil liability. State privacy laws (CCPA) add consumer data obligations.

European Union: GDPR applies to personal data processing regardless of scraping method. Legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f)) can justify B2B scraping with documented LIA. Database Directive (Sui Generis) protects substantial investment in database compilation — relevant for wholesale replication.

UK post-Brexit: similar to GDPR with UK GDPR; ICO guidance emphasizes proportionality.

Best practices both jurisdictions: scrape only public data, minimize personal data, respect robots.txt as evidence of intent, maintain audit logs, respond to cease-and-desist professionally, consult specialized counsel for high-stakes projects.

Scrapy Ninja operates from France (Wareld S.A.R.L.) and serves US and EU clients with jurisdiction-appropriate contracts.

Contact us by email

We usually respond in less than 6 hours.

info@scrapy.ninja